samedi 23 juin 2012

Le journal de Souad : C'est un jeudi que ma vie s'en est allée à la dérive



Il fait soleil, je viens de rentrer avec mes enfants après une détente au parc pendant 3h
à peu près.
Ce matin-là je suis allée à mon cours, j'y vais deux fois par semaine, mon emploi du temps est chargé.
Nous sommes en mars et la saison est belle, je me sens bien, j'aime le retour du soleil, sa lueur m'inspire toujours la joie même si j'aime l'hiver, ce froid qui vous invalide, vous bafoue, parfois vous secoue.
Cependant, l'hiver est pour moi lié à la nostalgie, il est mystérieux et me fait souffrir dans mes entrailles.
Je garde sans doute des séquelles liées à l'enfance.
J'avais préparé le souper avant d'aller au parc ; une fois rentrés, nous nous débarbouillons, les enfants et moi. Lui ne rentre jamais avant 21h.
Le téléphone sonne, mon interlocutrice me signifie sa venue ; elle est accompagnée d'une tierce personne et elle veut absolument venir.
Je suis un peu surprise car elle insiste pour que ce soit tout de suite. Je me perds en explications - souper, dodo des enfants, etc - mais cela semble important.
Elle fait en sorte que les enfants soient isolés et me prend à part : « Je dois te parler, sois courageuse » me dit-elle. Je la regarde, elle tremble, elle pleure et pendant ce laps de temps aussi rapide que l'éclair, trente-six mille drames se bousculent dans ma tête. Le plus douloureux : peut-être la mort d'un des miens.
Il s'agissait d'un deuil à coup sûr. 
Que s'était-il passé ?
Je me revois debout, et elle me dit enfin : « Ton mari a une double vie, un enfant, un autre appart près de votre commerce ».
Les mots écorchaient sa voix avant que l'impact ne se loge sur moi ou en moi.
J'étais scindée âme et corps, cœur et raison.
Elle ajoute : « Tu fais ce que tu veux mais tu dois savoir ».
Je lui dis : « Ça va, t’inquiète pas, arrête, calme toi ».
Elle est désolée de me l'annoncer mais elle n'avait plus le choix. Elle formule le pardon à la place du responsable et ça je ne supporte pas.
« Ok », lui dis-je, « Depuis quand ? C'est qui ? L'enfant a quel age ? »
Je suis abasourdie. Impossible de décrire cela avec exactitude. La souffrance laisse d'abord la place à la colère.
Quand elle vient, c'est avec plus de malice, la souffrance entre comme une sangsue, elle est entrée et, jour après jour, elle a grandi avec ma douleur aussi bien physique que psychique. Au bout de quelques jours, j'étais terrassée, vidée, sans forces, je prenais des cachets pour pouvoir manger.
C'est un jeudi que ma vie s'en est allée à la dérive, mais puisque j'étais sous l'emprise de la colère, j'ai pu, dès le lundi matin, prendre rendez-vous chez une avocate pour lancer la procédure de divorce.
Lui, pas question de le revoir : devant toutes les preuves, il ne trouva pas de défense sur le coup à part que tout avait été trop vite, qu'il ne voulait pas me quitter et tout le baratin de quelqu'un qui est pris la main dans le sac. Nous ne nous sommes plus revus ; je lui avait interdit de passer la porte d'entrée. Il venait prendre les enfants devant.

Le journal de Souad : Rien

22 mai 8h02















Quand on n'a plus rien, ou que l'on ne voit plus rien, on ne s'accroche à rien.
« Rien » peut être une personne confirmant le vide qui vous habite.
« Rien » peut être le noir de l'angoisse.
Quand on n'a plus rien ou que l'on ne se rend plus compte de l'essentiel, on sombre et c'est peu dire.
Relever la tête, sans doute que je ne le fais plus.
M'arracher à ce qui n'est pas ma responsabilité.
Accepter que ce sont des périodes.
Accepter que je me réfugie là où on ne peut aboutir parce que je suis celle qui a le plus peur.
Avancer sans trébucher, peut-être que c'est réaliser que ta vie a été un don : à toi d'en disposer pour ouvrir ton cœur sans avoir peur de le perdre à chaque fois.
Qui suis-je ?

Le journal de Souad : Je ne serai plus jamais la même.

16 février 2012













Pourquoi on cherche chaque fois à nier ton état en essayant de te consoler ?
Pourquoi on ne t'écoute pas tout simplement ?
Je ne serai plus jamais la même, mais qui étais-je ?
On s'inquiète de quoi quand on déguise ta vulnérabilité ?
Je suis fatiguée et je veux l'étaler, le dire, même le hurler.
Je veux à tout prix ce que je n'ai jamais eu.

Support JENGBA : JOINT ENTERPRISE: NOT GUILTY by ASSOCIATION (JENGbA) is a grassroots campaign supporting prisoners who have been convicted under joint enterprise but who are not guilty of the index offence.

Jun-22-2012

Help the UK's Wrongly Convicted Tuesday in London

Stand for justice at JENGbA Campaign Fundraiser; sometimes justice is not blind but the wrongly convicted are...
CD cover of Rapper 'Goddaz'
CD cover of Rapper Goddaz has Jordan Cunliffe's picture above the letter A. Goddaz will be joined by Alabama 3 and others to be announced for the special 26 June event.

(SALEM / LONDON) 
- By the time you are done reading this account of a wrongly convicted boy in England; his mother's pursuit of justice, and her support from one of the UK's most famous wrongly convicted men, you just might be asking where you can sign up to help. 
We all must remember that one single victory for a human being's injustice, is a battle won in the war for human rights, and that is in many respects what it is coming down to.

Our newsroom was advised of an upcoming fundraiser that is worth paying attention to. It is a call to assist an important cause for justice in the UK, and I hope people in the London area get out and support this group in their mission for justice by attending the scheduled event referenced below.

Paddy Hill photo: GuardianUK
Janet Cunliffe photo: Guardian UK
Janet Cunliffe is battling the legal system on behalf of her son Jordan, who she contends, was falsely convicted of Murder.
“
Myself and Paddy Hill (one of the Birmingham Six who was released on Appeal after 16 long years in prison) are guest speakers. We are hoping to raise money for the JENGbA Campaign as well as raising awareness to the abuse of the law of Joint Enterprise and the horror of being a Miscarriage of Justice as Paddy Hill was and my son Jordan Cunliffe's now is.
”

Both Paddy Hill and Janet Cunliffe have a great deal to say about civil and legal injustice in the UK today. In fact Mr. Hill can talk about the absence of it in ways that would likely make your skin crawl.
His story is one of false conviction under extreme prejudice, and eventual appeal and freedom. This political prisoner was called a terrorist, and then terrorized for more than a decade and a half by his own government. As the record would later show, Paddy Hill and the others were victims of a terrible miscarriage of justice.
"They have nothing in their whole imperial arsenal that can break the spirit of one Irishman who doesn't want to be broken"
- Bobby Sands

As Ms. Cunliffe mentioned, he is one of the 'Birmingham Six'- men convicted for being Provisional IRA (Irish Republican Army) members complicit in the infamous 'pub bombings' of 21 November 1974 in Birmingham, England that left 21 people dead, and 182 injured.
To this day, it is not clear whether the IRA was even involved in the incident, and it is a fact that Dáithí Ó Conaill, a member of the IRA's Army Council, denied any claim to the act the day following the deadly bombings:

“
If IRA members had carried-out such attacks, they would be court-martialled and could face the death penalty. The IRA has clear guidelines for waging its war. Any attack on non-military installations must be preceded by a 30-minute warning so that no innocent civilians are endangered.
”

At the time, Wikipedia states, IRA sources in London said that the bombs might have been planted by Ulster loyalists "bent on stirring-up a wave of anti-Irish feeling in Britain".
Mulberry Bush Pub bombing: justice4the21.blogspot.com
The political and media attention allowed the British occupational war in Northern Ireland to escalate tensions under the banner of terrorism, and these men were prosecuted for a crime that another group they had absolutely no connection to, actually claimed responsibility... the small militant group, "Manchester Brigade of Red Flag 74"; an organization that reportedly broke away from the International Marxist Group and claimed to have about 500 members.

The bombings brought a wave of anti-Irish sentiment; attacks were waged on members of the Irish community in Great Britain, and then just days after the bombings, the 'Prevention of Terrorism Act' was introduced by the British Government.

The Birmingham Six faced charges based on circumstantial evidence, for murder and conspiracy to cause explosions. Three men were charged with conspiracy and two also faced charges of unlawful possession of explosives.
Convicted and sentenced to life in what a higher court later determined to be a fabricated police case, he and the other men: Hugh Callaghan, Patrick Joseph Hill, Gerard Hunter, Richard McIlkenny, William Power and John Walker, who were physically abused by police and sentenced to life in prison, waited sixteen years behind bars for a successful appeal.
The Birmingham Six on the day of their release with
Chris Mullin MP (centre) Courtesy: innocent.org.uk

A police superintendent and two other police officers would be charged with perjury and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, Wikipedia explains. 

Unlike the Birmingham 6, the police were never prosecuted.
Paddy Hill eventually found his freedom, but for Janet Cunliffe and her son, the pain generated by this same legal system drags on. Jordan, a teenage youth, is serving a life sentence for Murder as one of three teens convicted in the death of a father that tangled with the boys, who reportedly had been drinking, after his daughter told him that they were vandalising a garden; and lost his life in a scuffle with the boys.

While her son was convicted by the courts in the death of Garry Newlove, the boy was prosecuted according to Joint Enterprise; an archaic doctrine introduced hundreds of years ago to outlaw duelling- of all things.

15-year old Jordan Cunliffe
"It means anyone associated with someone who commits a crime can be convicted alongside them for the same offence," JOINT ENTERPRISE: NOT GUILTY by ASSOCIATION (JENGbA), the group holding the upcoming fundraising event, explains.
The case against the youths coincided with a public outcry against teen drinking. By all accounts, the boys involved in this crime were made into examples of how harsh court administered penalties can be, but none of it matters of one of the boys is innocent.

Jordan Cunliffe was 15-years old at the time of this terrible, tragic event that robbed the life of a father of three. Without question, there are no words to describe this callous and tragic event that did not cost one life, but four if you think about it.

The problem with all of it, is that Jordan is legally blind, and he says he didn't lay a hand on Mr. Newlove. The prosecution contended that he was guilty - that he could see the crime, and encouraged it.

Yet as the Guardian wrote of the incident:
    For years, he has suffered from acute keratoconus, an eye condition. A medical report produced at the trial stated: "He is eligible to be registered as a blind person and is unable to perform any tasks for which vision is necessary." The report was accepted by the prosecution and read to the jury.
Janet Cunliffe rallying for her son Jordan.
He was still convicted in an emotionally charged trial. The 2007 incident was used as an example by the Conservative party's David Cameron, then leader of the opposition, who pointed to the death of Mr. Newlove as a symbol of "broken Britain".

The Guardian described the widow Helen Newlove's rage against the three convicted youths as "unrelenting".
    Newlove, who supports capital punishment – she told reporters in 2008 that the UK should have the death penalty – believes the trio convicted of killing her husband should never be released from prison.
While it is always natural for a mother to rally for her son, the conviction of Jordan Cunliffe, based on the existing evidence, truly seems full of holes.

From my perspective, it appears that he was convicted under a response to public pressure, rather than on the actual merits of the case.
“
Baroness Newlove, the victim's wife, continually appears in the media saying her husband was kicked in the head forty times and that my son stood and watched while this happened. This simply is not true.
Garry Newlove died due to a single blow to the neck and this was inflicted by one person. As Jordan wore no shoes and had no marks to his hands or his feet, this proves he played no part in any attack, and more importantly as Jordan was blind, to stand and watch as Baroness Newlove claims is something he most certainly could not do.
”

Jordan's mother says the case is an important one that shows just how unjust this legal principle is. It brings into the picture a unique problem: victim's families do not always understand what is happening during the trial; who is guilty or why. A select committee brief inquiry recently concluded this legal principle is "confusing for juries".
Jordan Cunliffe, who is legally blind, was
sent to life in prison at 15 for standing near
a crime that took place, even though he had
nothing to do with it.
“
If a blind 15-year old child can can slip through the net then this can happen to absolutely anyone. People need to start realising just how vulnerable they are if this law stays as it is. People need to show their support and speak out, no one should be made to take responsibility for someone elses actions, especially if they if they have no knowledge of that other persons actions, and the public need to do this now so that this does not have to happen to them or anyone else.
”

Janet stresses that the Tuesday, 26th June event, that will be held from 7:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. at The Tabernacle, 35 Powis Square, London, WA112AY, is extremely important.

A symbol of the growing awareness of the situation facing so many, is the fact that the Rapper Goddaz has written his latest single about Joint Enterprise, and he will be performing it at the Tabernacle and releasing it on the same day. As a staunch supporter of the campaign he will be donating all the proceeds to the JENGbA Campaign. Click image of the CD cover below, or here to download full size PDF with more details about the 26 June event. More entertainment is planned for this special evening; Alabama 3 will appear, along with other high profile guests.

Janet Cunliffe concluded by saying, "I know it will not be possible for everyone to attend, but please be aware, donate to the campaign or inform anyone you think may be interested."
Click image or here to download full size PDF
JOINT ENTERPRISE: NOT GUILTY by ASSOCIATION (JENGbA) is a grassroots campaign
supporting prisoners who have been convicted under joint enterprise but who are not
guilty of the index offence. We are all volunteers who have a loved one in prison for
something they did not do. We are campaigning to highlight the abuse of "joint
enterprise" to convict innocent people, including children, who are serving
mandatory LIFE sentences.

What is JOINT ENTERPRISE?

Joint Enterprise is an archaic doctrine that was introduced hundreds of
years ago to outlaw duelling. It means anyone associated with someone who
commits a crime can be convicted alongside them for the same offence.
PLEASE SUPPORT US – see our website www.jointenterprise.co
Or come along to our fundraiser in London on Tuesday 26th
Sources:
www.jointenterprise.co
Joint enterprise law questioned by mother of teen convict Eric Allison - The Guardian
Birmingham Six - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Birmingham pub bombings - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Morning Star on the campaign against the use of plastic bullets

Britain

MPs join calls to end deadly use of plastic bullets

Thursday 21 June 2012

MPs join calls to end deadly use of plastic bullets
Human rights activists and MPs demanded an absolute prohibition on the use of plastic bullets today as Tory-driven austerity cuts threaten more disturbances in the months and years to come.
Following last summer's riots, the Metropolitan Police has begun to stockpile thousands of the lethal projectiles, which have been responsible for 17 deaths and hundreds of serious injuries in Northern Ireland.
Nine of those killed were children and campaigners warned that if plastic bullets were deployed on the streets of England fatalities would doubtless occur.
The warning followed comments by Britain's top civil servant Jeremy Heywood that the country faced a decade of spending cuts.
The Home Office has made provision for a number of draconian policing measures including the use of baton rounds and water cannon to quell mounting protests and acts of civil disobedience against the brutal cuts programme.
United Campaign Against Plastic Bullets spokeswoman Clara Reilly said that it had been proven that the use of plastic bullets exacerbated tensions rather than calm them.
She said: "It's important for people in Britain to understand the human devastation of the use of plastic bullets in the North of Ireland.
"The majority of victims were killed in incidents where there was no disturbances prior to the use of plastic bullets.
"With ethnic minority communities in Britain experiencing serious difficulties with policing and with increased tensions, the use of plastic bullets, with the inevitable injuries and real potential for fatalities, will light a fire that will be hard to extinguish."
Ms Reilly was joined by Paddy Kelly of the Children's Law Centre and Tottenham-based activist Stafford Scott.
Ms Kelly said the number of plastic bullets fired in Northern Ireland had risen exponentially in the last few years, from 17 in 2009 to 350 fired in one month during the marching season last year.
She warned that with the Met hoarding a stockpile of over 10,000 rounds and growing tensions between police and communities such as Tottenham, it was highly likely that "some young person will be killed by plastic bullets."
Tottenham Defence campaign spokesman Mr Scott said: "The government's policies will cause more unrest on our streets but, rather than dealing with the causes it is looking to quell them with weapons such as these."
SDLP MP for Foyle Mark Durkan told the Star: "People should not be deceived by the soft names given to these lethal weapons.
"The volume in which they have been ordered shows that they are unlikely to be used sparingly."
Labour MPs Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell stated that they would raise the issue as a matter of urgency in the commons and added their voices to the call for total prohibition.
paddym@peoples-press.com

Campaign against plastic bullets

Protests Don’t Kill People, Plastic Bullets Do
 June 22, 2012 · by

http://onesmallwindow.wordpress.com/2012/06/22/protests-dont-kill-people-plastic-bullets-do/

Last month, the Metropolitan police confirmed that following the riots in August 2011, its stockpile of plastic bullets, or baton rounds, had increased to over 10,000 by the end of the year; just prior to that, the Met had around 700 bullets. Through a freedom of information (FOI) request made by former Liberal Democrat member of the London Assembly, Dee Dorcey, the Met revealed that in 2010-2011 the use of plastic bullets was authorised 22 times.  

The use of plastic bullets is very much a British method of crowd control. Pioneered as a “safer” alternative to rubber bullets, they were first used in Northern Ireland in the mid-1970s. In that decade alone, over 40,000 plastic bullets were fired. This “safer” method claimed its first victim in 1975 in 10-year old Stephen Geddis.

Since then, 13 other people have died. Hundreds of others have suffered upper body injuries, been blinded or suffered brain damage, most often not in riot situations, and children in particular have been affected. Plastic bullets were not designed for crowd control and are only to be used when absolutely necessary. Although the former chief constable called for an end to their use in 2007, plastic bullet use has increased in the past couple of years, with over 350 rounds fired in June to July 2011 alone.

With the fresh rise in plastic bullet use in the North of Ireland and stockpiling across other parts of the UK, in the same week as the inquest into the death of Sean Riggs in police custody and the trial of PC Simon Harwood for the death of Ian Tomlinson, a press conference was held in parliament on Thursday 21 June, “Use of Plastic Bullets will Fuel Racial Tensions”, chaired by Labour MPs Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell. Speakers included veteran campaigner on the issue, Clara Reilly, from the United Campaign Against Plastic Bullets (UCAPB), Paddy Kelly from the Children’s Law Centre in Belfast and Stafford Scott, from the Tottenham Defence Campaign (TDC), a supporter of the Mark Duggan family.

The UCAPB has been campaigning for almost 30 years against the use of plastic bullets in the North of Ireland and calls for an outright ban on the use of these “lethal and excessively dangerous weapons”. Clara Reilly, of the campaign, said that they were “dismayed” last year at news that plastic bullets could be deployed during the summer riots in England. Mrs Reilly said, “it is obvious there is much work to be done in local communities around racial tension and abuse, police accountability, poor housing, unemployment and how the promotion of human rights must become a policing priority.” She also expressed concern that the further escalation of the use of plastic bullets in the North of Ireland could put an end to the peace process.

Paddy Kelly of the Children’s Law Centre in Belfast expressed concern that at least one child will be murdered this summer by a plastic bullet. In 2010, a 17-year old suffered serious injuries. She described them as a serious breach of children’s rights and had only served to escalate tensions in the North of Ireland. She also expressed her worry that with the stockpiling of plastic bullets in the aftermath of the riots in England, the upcoming Olympics and rising racial tensions, plastic bullets could be used against black and Muslim youth this summer in England. She urged people in London to be vigilant “as the consequences are severe to bear”.

Stafford Scott of the TDC expressed concern that the government appears to have a greater interest in the police having and using plastic bullets than the police force itself. Mr Scott stated that in view of the recent riots, it appears that the government is well aware that its policies will fuel more unrest. He urged the government to rethink its strategy against protesters, as the use of plastic bullets, CS gas, water cannons and other heavy-handed deterrents to protest will not stop people taking to the streets to exercise their legitimate rights.

John McDonnell MP agreed with Stafford Scott’s analysis that there is a considerable political dynamic to this policing issue. Jeremy Corbyn MP said that under the current government there has been a move from policing by consent to policing by enforcement and that there is a security paranoia developing in the UK, making it easier for the police to access and justify large stores of such weapons.

The two MPs attending stated that they would take action on this issue. John McDonnell said that stopping the cuts and austerity measures is the only real viable alternative to preventing the type of social disorder such violent tactics are intended to quell.

The solution does not lie in arming the police or heavy-handed and dangerous policing but in dealing with the underlying causes of the increasing social unrest, embodied in the wide-sweeping cuts to public services, growing (youth and) general unemployment and the closure of facilities that foster social cohesion. Stockpiling these weapons creates hysteria and an impetus for their use, given their ease of access.

Recently, measures have been introduced further restricting the right to protest around parliament and severe sentences have been given to people taking part in student protests. Coupled with the austerity and privatisation agenda, the CEO of private security firm G4S also predicted this week that in five years’ time, large parts of the police service, a crucial public service, will be run by private firms. The prospect of unaccountable private “policemen” running around with plastic bullets is frightening.

In the North of Ireland, accountability has also been an issue with the public authorities. Families and individuals who have been affected have attempted to take legal action. Many court cases have been brought and while large amounts of compensation have been paid, an admission of wrongdoing in itself, only one policeman has ever been charged, in 1984 for the murder of John Downes; he was, however, acquitted. The police, army and government have not been held accountable in any way.

Plastic bullets are used elsewhere, including in Spain and the Occupied Territories. In spite of its use in the North of Ireland over the past few decades, there has been little reporting about this issue in the mainstream British media. Clara Reilly said, “the public has no idea of what plastic bullets are and what they can do, or they would otherwise be opposed to their use”.

lundi 11 juin 2012

Warda Mohamed : "Euro 2012 : et si on parlait de Mahmoud Sarsak ?"



Mahmoud Sarsak. 
Ce nom ne vous dit probablement rien. En grève de la faim depuis 85 jours, ce célèbre footballeur palestinien est pourtant sur le point de mourir dans une prison israélienne au moment où vous lisez ces lignes. Son crime ? Avoir voulu se rendre en Cisjordanie pour jouer un match avec son équipe nationale.

Arrêté il y a presque trois ans, alors qu’il allait disputer un match
Le footballeur professionnel de 25 ans est une star dans son pays. Originaire du camp de réfugiés de Rafah dans la bande de Gaza, Mahmoud Sarsak a été arrêté le 22 juillet 2009 au check-point d’Erez, alors qu’il se rendait à Naplouse (Cisjordanie) pour participer à un match de l’équipe nationale palestinienne de football. Après trente jours d’interrogatoire, il a été incarcéré sans procès, sans accusation précise et qualifié de “combattants illégal”, d’après Europalestine. Depuis cette date, sa détention administrative a été renouvelée six fois, toujours selon ce site. Mettant ainsi fin à son rêve.

Grève de la faim massive
Comme lui, 2000 prisonniers avaient entamé une grève de la faim sans précédent, ultime recours pour dénoncer la détention administrative pratiquée par Israël, qui lui permet de garder en prison des individus sans preuve, motif valable, ni procès. Sous la pression, Israël avait fini par céder. Mais n’a pas tenu ses promesses : des prisonniers ont été kidnappés après leur libération ou ont vu leur détention administrative renouvelée. Alors, le mouvement continue.

L’Association Palestinienne de Football essaie d’attirer, sans succès, l’attention de la FIFA, de l’UEFA et de la FFF (où une action a été menée) sur ce dossier afin que ces institutions demandent une libération immédiate du joueur. L’Euro 2012 était le rendez-vous rêvé pour évoquer le sort de cet homme. Il s’est transformé en cauchemar de l’indifférence.

Déjouer la mort
Mahmoud Sarsak est en grève de la faim depuis 85 jours, un record. Son état est critique. Son décès a même été annoncé sur les réseaux sociaux ce matin (où une campagne de soutien est en cours).

Le 10 mai dernier, le journaliste Dave Zirin écrivait dans le journal The Nation :  
« Imaginez qu’un membre de l’équipe de basket-ball des États-Unis, par exemple Kobe Bryant, se retrouve enlevé par un gouvernement étranger alors qu’il se rendait à un tournoi international, et soit gardé en prison pendant trois années sans procès ou même sans avoir connaissance des raisons pour lesquelles il a été emprisonné… Il y aurait des chances que de puissantes organisations de sports au niveau international - l’IOC, la FIFA - traitent le pays à l’origine de l’emprisonnement comme un paria jusqu’à ce que Kobe soit libéré. Et il y a de fortes chances que les Laker-haters (équipe de Los Angeles) portent des auto-collants qui diraient : « liberté pour Kobe ».

Euro 2012 : mobilisation ou silence complice ?
Sarsak n’a pas l’aura internationale de Bryant et ne suscitera pas de réactions de la part des instances sportives. Pourtant, Mahmoud Sarsak est un héros aux yeux des Palestiniens. Et de ceux qui défendent et portent sa cause. Pas assez connu. Trop Palestinien. Engagé, mais visiblement pas pour une cause assez noble pour que l’on daigne en parler, Sarsak ne sera pas évoqué durant cet Euro 2012. Pas plus que les autres détenus palestiniens menant le même combat pour la justice.

Dans le meilleur des cas, il aura droit à une minute de silence quand il mourra. Mais ce n’est pas de silence dont Mahmoud Sarsak a besoin. C’est au contraire de bruit, de beaucoup de bruit.